Vaccine Solutions:
Homeoprophylaxis or HP for short has been well utilized for centuries in India, Brazil, Australia, Europe, Africa, Cuba and elsewhere as both short-term prevention during epidemic disease outbreaks as well as long-term prevention of childhood and contagious diseases.
HP is a natural, non-toxic method of disease prevention to reduce susceptibility and manage illnesses more effectively in the event that it is contracted.
Mindfully Vaccinating:
Homeoprophyalxis provides us with arguably the same disease protection (referenced in Part 2) as the conventional approach; however, given the current socio-political climate I do not recommend opting out entirely. Instead I often recommend working with the current system we have in place; delaying vaccines and designing a homeopathic program to mitigate and side effects or associated risks. If you are part of the holistic-minded community, and chances you are – if you are reading this, then you may have experienced first hand the damaging effects of vaccines within your family or know friends who have.
You have every reason to proceed cautiously, but I advise not letting that lead to avoidance altogether. Homeoprophyalxis is re-emerging at a crucial time with disease outbreaks not far from us all. Vaccinate mindfully, with homeopathy.
Clinical experience since 1798, evidence from both small and large scale interventions, plus Dr. Goldens statistical analysis in the table below, all support a consistent level of effectiveness of around 90% for homeopathic vaccine alternatives. This makes it comparably effective to conventional vaccination practices!
| Measures of Reactions & Efficacy
Data After Follow-Up Surveys |
Data Series
1-5 |
Data Series
6-10 |
Data Series
11-15 |
TOTALS
|
||
| Total Responses | 708 | 817 | 817 | 2,342 | ||
| 1. Previously Vaccinated | 73 | 102 | 110 | 285 | ||
| 10.3% | 12.5% | 13.5% | 12.2% | |||
| 2. Had definite reactions to HP
Reactions per person Reactions per dose (estimated) |
51 | 81 | 81 | 213 | ||
| 7.2% | 9.9% | 9.9% | 9.1% | |||
| 1.2% | 1.7% | 1.7% | 1.5% | |||
| 3. Number of participants who were definitely exposed to diseases covered by the Main Program | 177 | 127 | 113 | 417 | ||
| 25.0% | 15.5% | 13.8% | 17.8% | |||
| 4. Number of participants who definitely suffered from diseases covered by the Main Program | 18 | 11 | 11 | 40 | ||
| 2.5% | 1.3% | 1.4% | 1.7% | |||
| 5. Number of participants who had taken appropriate HP remedy and definitely suffered the disease after definite exposure – failure | 18/177 | 11/127 | 11/113 | 40/417 | ||
| 10.2% | 8.7% | 9.7% | 9.6% | |||
| 6. Number of participants definitely not suffering diseases, after definite exposure and after taking appropriate remedy – effectiveness | 159/177 | 116/127 | 102/113 | 377/417 | ||
| 89.8% | 91.3% | 90.3% | 90.4% |
Related Blog Posts
Book Appointment
If you are interested in discussing if your specific condition is a good candidate for treatment, please contact me with your questions, come in for a complimentary consultation or simply book an appointment via the link above.
Open Thursday – Sunday by appointment only.
*Complimentary 20 minute consultations by appointment or phone (973) 433 – 6812
**Consultations may be arranged by zoom or telephone